Sunday, September 15, 2013

Internet is a well of information but how to protect our source of living?


A respond to
AT&T threatens to disconnect users accused of copyright infringement [1]
By Cory Doctorow at 5:47 pm Sat, Sep 14, 2013

Response


Internet is a well of information but not everyone is allowed to drink from a stream or gush from a certain springs because of copyright infringement and the intellectual property.

We often come across some material and from time to time we took some of these materials as quotations without paying attentions to copyright infringement even in our good intention in attributing the right of these materials to its copyrights holder.

The Question arise what is copyright infringement?
Canada  laws regarding copyright infringement?
“The Copyright Act of Canada is the federal statute governing copyright law in Canada. The Copyright Act of Canada was first passed in 1921 and substantially amended in 1988 and 1997. Several attempts were made between 2005 and 2011 to amend the Copyright Act, but each of the bills (Bill C-60 in 2005, Bill C-61 in 2008, and Bill C-32 in 2010) failed to pass due to political opposition. In 2011, with a majority in the House of Commons, the Conservative Party introduced Bill C-11, titled the Copyright Modernization Act. Bill C-11 was passed and received Royal Assent on June 29, 2012”

I will state some of the rights:
“Provisions of the Copyright Act of Canada
Rights granted
Copyright grants the sole and exclusive right to create and recreate a work whether wholly or substantially. It also includes the sole rights to:
  • publish the work if unpublished
  • perform the work in public
  • to produce, reproduce, perform or publish any translation of the work,
  • in the case of a dramatic work, to convert it into a novel or other non-dramatic work,
  • in the case of a novel or other non-dramatic work, or of an artistic work, to convert it into a dramatic work, by way of performance in public or otherwise,
  • in the case of a literary, dramatic or musical work, to make any sound recording, cinematograph film or other contrivance by means of which the work may be mechanically reproduced or performed,
  • in the case of any literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, to reproduce, adapt and publicly present the work as a cinematographic work,
  • in the case of any literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, to communicate the work to the public by telecommunication,
  • to present at a public exhibition, for a purpose other than sale or hire, an artistic work created after June 7, 1988, other than a map, chart or plan,
  • in the case of a computer program that can be reproduced in the ordinary course of its use, other than by a reproduction during its execution in conjunction with a machine, device or computer, to rent out the computer program, and
  • in the case of a musical work, to rent out a sound recording in which the work is embodied,and to authorize any such acts.[12]
I think a lot of good work done with Canadian copyright infringements.

US laws state


As a general matter, copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is reproduced, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or made into a derivative work without the permission of the copyright owner.”
United Nations through the WIBO (World Intellectual Property Organization in Geneva) subsidiary define copyright in the following manners:
"Copyright and related rights are legal concepts and instruments which, while respecting and protecting the rights of creators in their works, also contribute to the cultural and economic development of nations. Copyright law fulfills a decisive role in articulating the contributions and rights of the different stakeholders taking part in the cultural industries and the relation between them and the public.

"WIPO, through its Copyright and Related Rights Sector, is committed to that crucial role."

In such treaty, the United Nations treaty different aspects of copyrights concerns are elaborated:
Scope of Copyright Protection
Copyright protection extends to expressions and not to ideas, procedures, methods of operation or mathematical concepts as such.
...

Article 4
Computer Programs
...

Article 5
Compilations of Data (Databases)
...
Article 6
Right of Distribution
...

Article 7
Right of Rental
...

Article 8
Right of Communication to the Public
...

Article 9
Duration of the Protection of Photographic Works
...
Article 10
Limitations and Exceptions
...

Article 11
Obligations concerning Technological Measures
...

Article 12
Obligations concerning Rights Management Information
...

Article 13
Application in Time
...

Article 14
Provisions on Enforcement of Rights
...

Article 15
Assembly
...

Article 16
International Bureau
...

Article 17
Eligibility for Becoming Party to the Treaty
...
Article 18
Rights and Obligations under the Treaty
...

Article 19
Signature of the Treaty
...

Article 20
Entry into Force of the Treaty
...

Article 21
Effective Date of Becoming Party to the Treaty
...

Article 22
No Reservations to the Treaty
...

Article 23
Denunciation of the Treaty
...

Etc.

While copyright and intellectual property are a major concerns for huge numbers of people, private and public sectors to protect their investments and source of living we are faced by opposed arguments and great opposition [2] that web information should be open for the public on the alibi of humanity progress and share of knowledge while I found great numbers of those people are abusing such information and exploiting it to their own benefit.

That was my response to the person who gave himself the right to wirelessly exploit his neighbour internet connection and banned him from his right to get the service he paid for.

That why I’m supporting the AT&T for its act. In this sense, they have the right to punish such parasitical comportment.

This was a responds with AT&T act, and to the above rascal, and scamp comportment that abuse his neighbour connection and want to ban him from internet.

That was about copyright infringements but what about intellectual property and exploiting and abusing such intellectuality.  I always learned from my Professors that Ideas what counts? 

In addition while walking in the PALACE OF JUSTICE I found a heavy book on a desk in one of the court room with the title

“Intellectual Property how laws protecting it”, or the like.  That will be my next topic on how these intellectual properties are being broken by many aspects, and mainly by spying and key logger.            .

No comments:

Post a Comment